The time it takes for a 5kW system to pay for itself in capital cities.

Perth: 3–4 years

Darwin: 5–6 years

Brisbane: 4 years

Sydney: 4 years

Canberra: 4–5 years

Melbourne: 5 years

Hobart: 5 years

Adelaide: 2–3 years

What is an STC?

An STC is a form of currency available to owners of small-scale renewable energy systems. Under the federal government's Solar Credits Scheme, eligible households receive money for STCs created by their PV systems. STCs were formerly known as renewable energy certificates or RECs. Currently, the scheme allows you to cash in the certificates you could earn over the next several years straight away.

A new solar PV system will generate a certain number of STCs depending on the size of the system and its location. Generally, the bigger the system and the sunnier the region it's in, the more STCs it will generate. As an example, a 6.6kW system in Sydney installed in 2024 will generate 63 STCs.

While the government has set a price of $40 per STC sold through the STC Clearing House, the price you get will vary depending on how you choose to sell your STCs.

Is the STC rebate going to end?

You may see scare campaigns from some solar installers, usually towards the end of each year, urging you to "buy solar now before the rebate ends". The STC scheme isn't about to end, but it does reduce slightly at the end of each year. It was never planned to run forever – its purpose is to incentivise more Australians to install solar and help make the solar market mainstream and affordable. It diminishes a bit every year and will eventually become zero in 2031.

How to sell your STCs

Have the installer sell your STCs for you: The easiest and most common option is to allow someone else – usually the installer – to sell your STCs on your behalf. This may then be applied as a discount to your installation costs (so it acts like a rebate). The benefit is that the process is easy, with all the paperwork taken care of for you. The downside is you're likely to get a little less money per STC as the installer will take a cut of the transaction, or impose an administration fee, for handling the STCs. You can usually expect about $35–39 per STC.

Sell your own STCs: The second option is to sell the STCs yourself, which involves considerable paperwork, applications and fees. Depending on the number of buyers and the time it takes to complete the process, it may be months after installation before you receive your funds. There's no way to tell exactly how long you could be waiting, which means unless you have the capital you might find yourself out of pocket. You might be able to get a better price than that offered by the solar installer, though maybe not enough to be worth the effort.

How much money will you make selling STCs?

Using the above example, a 6.6kW system installed in 2024 in Sydney will generate 63 STCs. Assuming a sale price of $39 per STC, that's a $3198 saving off the cost of the system.

A FiT is the rate you're paid for feeding electricity back into the grid (assuming your panels are grid-connected). Nowadays you don't make much money from FiTs, so it's best to maximise your own use of your solar PV and minimise your export to the grid.

How feed-in tariffs work

Almost all FiTs around Australia are now net FiTs. This means a household is only paid for surplus electricity fed into the grid after domestic use is subtracted. If your system produced 3000kWh, for example, and you used 2500kWh of electricity in your home during the day (the time when your PV system was generating power), the rate is only paid for the 500kWh difference.

(Gross feed-in tariffs, where households are paid for all the electricity their panels produce, irrespective of their own domestic electricity consumption, are no longer available for new applicants in any state or territory.)

How much money do you make from feed-in tariffs?

FiT rates around the country have plummeted over the past few years. Coming off a high of up to 60c per kWh in some parts of the country several years ago, FiTs are now usually in the range of 4c to 8c/kWh, depending on where you're located and which energy retailer you choose. However, they can go up to 15c/kWh or more, depending on your energy retailer, time of day and other factors.

Note: In some states and territories, newly installed solar PV systems no longer qualify for a guaranteed FiT. However, many energy companies offer a voluntary FiT instead. Check with your energy company or the appropriate regulatory authority in your state:

• ACT: Everyday Climate Choices
• NSW: Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal 
• NT: Territory Renewable Energy
• Qld: Department of Energy and Public Works
• SA: Department of Energy and Environment
• Tas: Office of the Economic Regulator
• Vic: Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning
• WA: Energy Policy WA

Apartment buildings face more challenges than a freestanding house when it comes to installing solar panels. The elevated roof space may require cranes for access, and it can be complicated to share and meter the solar power between all the apartments. The owner's corporation needs to agree to any such installations and despite the potential benefits of solar, it may be hard to get enough owners to agree to the work.

One solution can be to have the solar panel system supply power to only the common areas, such as lighting in hallways, foyers and carparks, along with lifts, swimming pool pumps and so on. This will help reduce the building's running costs, and therefore keep strata levies down.

If the apartment building is relatively small, it can be possible to install solar panels that directly feed into individual apartments. But this can still be a big project – fair allocation of roof space, and the complexity of the wiring, are just two of the hurdles you need to clear.

Another solution is to engage a solar company such as Allume Energy that specialises in apartment buildings. They can provide an installation that includes hardware and software management of the solar power distribution to make sure it's allocated fairly between apartments (and the common areas) and is metered accordingly. This adds expense to the installation, but may be the only practical option for a large apartment building wanting to provide solar to most or all apartments.

The remaining option for an apartment building is for the solar to be included at design and construction stage. This is still a complex piece of work but can be the best way to truly integrate solar power into the building.

Renters have limited options for going solar. While some rented properties will already have solar panels, most do not.

As a renter, you could put a case to the property owner for getting solar installed. You might offer to pay more rent in return for the reduced power bills you'll get. The owner gets the benefit of increased rent, plus longer-term added value for the property.

Alternatively you could invest in a community solar project or solar farm. While you won't directly get solar power from it, you do get dividends or credits on your electricity bill, and you're helping to add more renewable energy into the grid.

What's the problem with the electricity grid?

The electricity grid in Australia was originally built with the expectation that electricity went in one direction only, from power stations to homes and businesses. It wasn't designed to also allow for solar-generated power to flow back the other way. While that's been possible to a reasonable extent so far, the grid is starting to hit the limits of how much electricity it can handle from domestic rooftop solar.

The grid needs a lot of work to update it to become flexible enough to take full advantage of renewable energy sources including domestic solar feed-in, but also allow flexibility for all consumers. This work has to be paid for somehow. Currently, some consumers (renters, apartment owners, low-income households) have little access to the benefits of solar power but must still pay for electricity, and to some extent they subsidise the benefits that solar owners obtain.

Solar owners also are disadvantaged by the lack of flexibility and modernisation of the grid, in that in some areas, there is already limited or zero feed-in due to capacity constraints on the local grid. This means that some solar owners get limited or no feed-in tariff income, and their excess solar-generated electricity may be wasted.

What's the solution?

The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) has proposed several changes to how the market and the grid operate, to allow more flexibility in how power is bought and sold, and to better accommodate domestic solar, batteries and electric cars in future.

New electricity infrastructure ("poles and wires") will still be needed, but we also need to use the electricity supply in a much smarter way, and rebuilding the grid so that it properly accommodates solar-generated electricity from homes is part of the solution.

The plan includes the option of two-way tariffs for solar PV system owners who export power to the grid. This is the so-called "sun tax", but that's not really an accurate name. These extra tariffs do impose costs, but also offer increased payments to the system owner in certain circumstances.

The AEMC expects that the proposed tariffs for solar owners will only have a small effect on their overall return from feed-in tariffs (FiTs). For example, a consumer with a 6–8kW solar panel system is expected to see their typical return from FiTs drop at worst by $106, from $1284 p.a. to $1178 p.a. 

The actual cost will depend very much on exactly how the tariffs are implemented, how the solar system is set up, and how much the solar owner uses their own solar power. For many solar owners the impact will be less than the above estimate, and possibly even a net increase in returns, if they're able to time their solar export to deliver excess energy when the grid needs it in the late afternoon or evening (when energy retailers are likely to offer a better FiT to attract more exported power). The AEMC has published an explanation of the proposals and modelling.

This situation may make it more attractive to install panels that face partly east or west, to maximise power generation in the morning and late afternoon rather than only in the middle of the day. It may also make storage batteries more economically attractive. If FiTs end up as low as a few cents per kWh during the middle of the day, but increase to much better rates in the late afternoon and early evening when demand on the grid is highest, it may make sense to store your excess power in a battery and sell it back to the energy retailer in the evening.

It will also make sense (even more than it does now) to use as much of your own solar power as possible, as that will reduce any surcharge for exporting power to the grid.

Is this necessary, and shouldn't the electricity networks have planned better?

There is a lot of debate about whether this "sun tax" is reasonable. Many consider that it is much more of a penalty than an incentive (too much "stick" and not enough "carrot"); that it benefits electricity distributors much more than consumers; and is an unfair imposition on people who installed solar panels expecting a reasonable feed-in tariff to help pay for them.

Others say that feed-in tariffs were never expected to remain high forever, and that re-engineering the grid to be fully flexible with solar export peaks is costly and could make electricity too expensive for those unable to install their own solar panel systems. 

As long as these schemes are controlled by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER), and the impact on consumers is transparent, then there should still be a clear overall benefit in having a solar panel system for your home, and hopefully, a net benefit to all electricity consumers. 

When is all this going to happen?

The roll-out of the new charges and rewards began in 2024 as Ausgrid, one of the major NSW electricity distributors, introduced two-way pricing tariffs across its network. Currently, under this tariff scheme, solar owners are paid an extra 2.3c/kWh for electricity exported in the peak demand period (4pm to 9pm) but are penalised with an export charge of 1.2c/kWh for exports between 10am and 3pm. (These fees are currently optional, but will become mandatory for all Ausgrid customers as of July 2025.)

There is a minimum threshold of exported power that won't incur the penalty; it's a monthly threshold, which works out on average to about 6.83kWh per day. 

These tariffs are imposed by Ausgrid on the energy retailer, not directly on the consumer. The energy retailer (the company that actually provides your electricity plan) may then pass them on to consumers by adding them to the feed-in tariff it pays you. So if your usual FiT is 4c/kWh, and you're on the Ausgrid network, you'll effectively be paid a higher FiT of 6.3c/kWh (4c plus 2.3c) for electricity exported between 4pm and 9pm, and a reduced FiT of 2.8c/kWh (4c minus 1.2c) for electricity exported between 10am and 3pm.

The net result is not that you'll have to pay for exporting electricity; it's just that you will probably end up being paid a bit less for the FiT. However, you may end up earning more FiT than before if your system is set up to export more power in the later afternoon when the grid needs it most (for example, if you have several west-facing panels, or a battery set up for power export in the late afternoon and evening).

Ausgrid states that "If the retailer fully passed through our two-way tariff, a typical 5 kW solar customer will see an annual bill increase of $6.60 per year." Most modern solar systems are much larger than 5kW, so the cost impact is likely to be greater for many such homes. Nevertheless it's a small impact compared to the overall long term savings.

Other electricity distributors have similar schemes, or are planning them for the future, including Endeavour Energy.

While reduced FiT is certainly not welcome news, the bottom line is still that the most benefit comes from consuming as much of your own solar power as possible. It still makes sense to consider investing in solar power for your home right now.

If you'd like to estimate the impact of these tariffs on your solar electricity plan, try the SolarQuotes "Sun Tax" calculator.

Solar panels in Australia work best when they're facing north, pointed directly at the sun, at an optimal angle and not blocked by trees or shading. However, as the electricity market changes (see the discussion of the changing grid and the so-called "sun tax" above) it may become practical to have some panels facing east and west, for more power generation in the early morning and late afternoon.

Solar panels to suit a very hot climate

Some panels have better temperature tolerance than others (look for a lower 'temperature coefficient') and are therefore a better choice in hot climates.

Although solar panels are meant to sit on roofs in direct sunlight, they actually become less efficient as they get warmer, due to the physics of the photovoltaic effect. So you'll sometimes get less power from the panels on a very hot day than on a mild day (and remember, even on a 25°C day, your rooftop panels could be operating at well above 40°C). Solar panel power ratings are based on standard conditions (25°C panel temperature).

Panels should be installed in a way that allows air to circulate underneath to help keep them cooler.

You should make sure any solar PV system you consider has met Australian and international standards. To be eligible for small-scale technology certificates, your solar panels must be certified – ask your installer to supply proof. You can check the CEC's list of currently approved inverters, modules (panels) and batteries to confirm.

Also, the Clean Energy Regulator has partnered with the solar industry and peak bodies to introduce the Solar Panel Validation Initiative. This scheme allows businesses in the Small-scale Renewable Energy Scheme supply chain to check if solar panels are genuine before they are installed. Participating installers and suppliers will be able to use the scheme to provide you with a verified report confirming that the panels they've installed on your roof are genuine and that you're getting what you've paid for.

There are two warranties provided for solar panels: one for the product, and another for its performance.

Product warranty

This is the warranty for the panel itself. It's the typical type of warranty that offers repair or replacement if there are any manufacturing faults. Many solar panel product warranties are for 10 or 12 years, but increasingly we see manufacturers offering 15 years or more, even up to 40 years for certain Sunpower solar panels. As always, a longer warranty is a good indication of the manufacturer's confidence in their product.

It's important to know the difference between the product and performance warranties – you'll see a 25-year performance warranty promoted more loudly than a 10-year product warranty, but the product warranty is the one that you're more likely to call on if there's any problem.

Performance warranty

The performance warranty is a guarantee that that as long as the panel is functioning and undamaged, it will still produce a guaranteed minimum percentage of its claimed power rating after a certain period, typically about 80% after 25 years. The warranty usually also promises that the panel will degrade in an orderly, linear fashion – that is, it will only lose a small and predictable amount of power output each year.

Most solar panels have 25-year performance warranties, and most solar PV systems should last at least that long (with some maintenance along the way). Some performance warranties now run longer, for 30 or 40 years.

Note that it can be hard to tell whether your panels are truly performing as they should, especially after several years. If you believe your panels aren't performing as expected, the performance warranty may put the onus and cost on you to have the panels tested in order to make a warranty claim.

It's also a question as to whether a manufacturer will still be around in 20+ years to honour a warranty claim. Nevertheless, these warranties do give some assurance that manufacturers are confident in the long-term performance of these products.

Other warranties

As well as the warranties for the solar panels, you should also get a warranty from the installer for their workmanship in installing the system – the mounting racks, wiring and connections. This will typically be one or two years – which should be enough to detect any major problems – but as always, a longer warranty is better.

The inverter will also have its own warranty, typically five years but they can be up to 10 years or more.

Home insurance

Your solar panels and inverter are part of your house and as such are covered by your home insurance. However, you should make sure your home's insured amount is increased, to cover the replacement cost of the solar panel system. See our guide to solar panels and home insurance.

• What is the FiT you'll be paid and how often will you get it? How will you receive it? As a discount off your energy bill or as a standalone cash payment?
• Will you need to change to a new smart meter and what will it cost?
• What is the cost of the electricity you purchase from your retailer (in cents per kWh), and will you lose your off-peak rates if you install solar?
• Will you be charged a higher daily fixed charge if you connect your solar PV system?
• Do you have to pay any additional fees?

Solar panel systems don't need a lot of maintenance, but it's a good idea to check in on the system occasionally to see how it's performing. Your electricity bills and the display panel on the inverter can be enough to tell you whether everything is functioning as expected.

For a more detailed check-up, a solar monitoring system such as Solar Analytics can give you a wealth of information about what your system is doing and when, such as the power produced, how much is being sent to the grid, and your home's power consumption at any given moment. A monitoring system will cost you a few hundred dollars extra though, either as an upfront cost or as a yearly fee.

Unless your panels are particularly prone to being covered with dust, leaves or other matter, there's usually no need to wash them – rain will do that well enough.

It's worthwhile having the whole system inspected by a professional (an accredited solar installer) every few years to make sure all is well and the electrical connections are safe. It's also worth doing if you've just bought a property with an existing solar panel system. An inspection can cost up to about $300. Some states and territories have audit or inspection programs to ensure ongoing safety of solar panel systems.

This is the amount of power (electricity) the panel should deliver under standard lab conditions (25°C, sea level air pressure and a specific amount of sunlight or irradiance). It's measured in watts (W). When you see a panel described as 350W or 400W, that's the nominal power rating.

The higher the number, the more electricity you'll get from the panel.

Note that real world conditions on your rooftop are rarely very close to the standard lab conditions; temperature, humidity and the amount of sunlight will all vary depending on the time of day, the weather and the season, and on average each panel will usually deliver less than its rated amount. But in ideal conditions (such as midday on a cool, clear, sunny day), the panel should deliver close to its rated power.

A measure of how efficient the panel is at converting sunlight to electricity; or looked at another way, it's the panel's electricity output (in watts) compared to its surface area. The bigger the number, the better. Due to the physics and engineering of solar cells, a large amount of the sunlight energy can't be converted directly to electricity; efficiencies of about 19% to 22% are common.

This is how much you can expect any individual sample of the panel to vary from its nominal power rating. Small variations in the manufacturing process mean that not every panel is identical. For example, a 400W panel with a claimed power tolerance of 0 to 5W should deliver at least 400W under standard lab conditions, but could actually be up to 405W. So the rated nominal power is actually a minimum rating in most cases.

This shows how well the panel responds to higher temperatures. The hotter a solar panel gets, the less efficient it becomes. A panel with a lower temperature coefficient will be better suited to operating efficiently in hot climates. The temperature coefficient is shown as a percentage change per degree Celsius, such as -0.37%/°C. In this example, for every degree the temperature rises above 25°C, the power output of the panel will drop by 0.37%.

That doesn't sound like much, but it adds up; even on a mildly warm sunny day of 25°C, the temperature of a black solar panel on your rooftop could be up to 50°C. In this example, (50-25) x 0.37 = 9.25. So the panel has lost 9.25% of its capacity due to the heat; for a 400W panel, that means it's effectively operating at 363W.

Typical panels on the market today have temperature coefficients ranging from -0.30%/°C to -0.40%/°C.

Don't worry too much about this number, but if you live where the rooftop temperatures are often going to be fiercely hot, then it's worth considering panels with a good (low number) temperature coefficient.

What's in a solar panel?

Most solar cells are made of silicon. Solar panels, also called modules, are each made of several solar cells (typically 60 cells, but some have 72 or more), connected together and sandwiched between protective glass and a backing plate. The whole panel is usually surrounded with an aluminium frame. A typical installation includes several panels connected together in an array.

Types of solar panels

Almost all panels used in home solar systems are mono- or multi-crystalline. While there are technical differences between these types, don't put too much consideration into this – it's much more important to consider other aspects such as price, rated power output, and warranties.

The rated power output, or capacity, of solar panels has increased over the years as manufacturers find ways to squeeze out more power. Not so many years ago, 250W panels were common – now, you'll often be offered panels of the same size that deliver 400W, 500W or even more.

Most solar panels are DC, meaning they generate a high voltage Direct Current (DC) which goes to the inverter unit (called a string inverter) on your wall, which in turn changes that to Alternating Current (AC) for use in your home's electrical circuits. 

Some panels are classed as AC, which come with a pre-installed microinverter on each panel,  typically an Enphase microinverter. Though the panel itself generates DC power as usual, it's immediately converted to AC by the microinverter. See our solar inverter buying guide for the pros and cons of string inverters vs microinverters.

Monocrystalline panels are typically black and have a reputation for higher efficiency than multicrystalline (or polycrystalline) models, which are typically dark blue and are sometimes said to have better temperature tolerance. The differences come from the manufacturing processes of the silicon cells in each case. Monocrystalline panels are increasingly the common option for home installations.

In practice there's not necessarily a clear advantage either way: as with most high-tech products, solar panels are a complex assembly of many components and the overall performance depends on more than simply the type of cell.

Interdigitated back contact solar cells (IBC), or rear contact solar cells, are a variant of standard solar cells. They can achieve higher efficiency by having all the electrical contacts on the rear of the cell (rather than at the front), so there are no metal contact strips preventing light getting to the cell surface.

A PERC cell, or Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (also Passivated Emitter and Rear Contact), is a high-efficiency form of solar cell. The back of the cell is more reflective, which means that any light which passed through the cell and missed its chance to cause the silicon to generate electricity can be reflected back through the cell for a second chance. 

There's a lot more to it than that, and there are some potential pitfalls with this technology, but the basics are that PERC cells are generally more efficient at producing electricity than non-PERC cells. 

Heterojunction or HJT is a solar panel design that's been around for many years, and is often claimed to be the simplest and most effective design for improving solar panel efficiency, with the potential to surpass PERC cells for efficiency as the technology continues to develop. It combines layers of conventional crystalline silicon cells with thin film solar cells. 

Thin film solar cells are made from a thin layer of photovoltaic material (such as amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride or copper-indium-gallium-selenide) on a base plate of glass, metal or other substance. 

This technology is evolving and while it promises more flexible applications than standard solar panels, it's so far generally less efficient and is rare in rooftop arrays. It's used in various large and small applications, from building-integrated PV systems to solar-powered calculators and garden lamps.

Bifacial panels have solar cells on both faces, i.e. front and back, as their name implies. When mounted in the same way as a regular solar panel, the front faces the sky as usual, and the back picks up scattered and reflected sunlight from the roof or ground. 

They can also be mounted vertically, for instance facing east-west, to maximise solar power generation all through the day (one side catching the morning sun in the east, while the other side catches the afternoon sun in the west) – this may be particularly useful in mass arrays on a commercial solar farm. 

Depending on how they're mounted and how much reflected sunlight is available, they can deliver anything from 5% to over 20% more power than a single-faced panel of the same power rating. Their power output is very dependent on how they're mounted (more so than for regular panels) and industry is still working on an agreed standard method to rate their overall power output. 

Our review includes some bifacial models as they are now starting to be offered for home installations. Test results show that when used in a well-designed installation, bifacial modules can indeed deliver more power than an equivalent single-faced panel, but it's not guaranteed.